The presiding Judge of the Election Presidential Tribunal has struck off the case of the Allied People’s Movement (APM) against the alleged double nominations of Vice President, Kashim Shettima.
The court struck off the case because of the perceived lack of logic and the party’s failure to disclose any reasonable cause of action.
The APM had initiated the legal action, raising concerns about Kashim Shettima’s purported double nominations.
But, after a thorough scrutiny of the case, the presiding Justice found the petition to be lacking in coherence and substance.
The Justice’s decision to strike off the case underscores the importance of presenting clear and logical arguments in legal matters.
A petition must disclose a valid reason for action to proceed through the legal process effectively.
While the APM’s concerns regarding double nominations may be legitimate, how the case was presented appears to have fallen short of legal standards.
The decision of the court emphasises the significance of adhering to legal procedures and ensuring that petitions are logically structured and provide a valid reason for action. It also highlights the role of the justice system in upholding the principles of fairness and adherence to established legal norms.
READ OTHER STORIES: